- Source type
- Study
- Access type
- Publisher
- Publisher
- Nature
- Date
- 2014
- Added
- 2026-07-06
- Updated
- 2026-07-06
Trust profile
VV Source Trust Matrix v1.0
VV Source Trust Matrix v1.0 asks whether this source is trustworthy for the claim lane being used, not whether every possible claim from it is equally strong.
88
Peer-reviewed research publisher
- Publisher type
- Peer-reviewed journal
- Bias profile
- Moderate
This source is strongest for clinical outcomes and mechanism and weaker for regulatory status and trial discovery.
VV Source Fit Score 1.0
Fit by use case
Fit scores are role-specific. A source can be excellent for one claim lane and weak for another.
- Regulatory status
- 65/100
- Context Source
- Clinical outcomes
- 92/100
- Primary Anchor
- Mechanism
- 90/100
- Primary Anchor
- Safety
- 86/100
- Strong Support
- Consumer context
- 72/100
- Context Source
- Trial discovery
- 65/100
- Context Source
Best used for
- Primary studies
- Systematic reviews
- Mechanistic research
Weak for
- Regulatory status
- Universal consumer recommendations
Used in Viral Vitalism
Sweeteners: Sugar Escape Hatch or Metabolic Shell Game?
Roles: Primary source
Show section-level references
Related studies
Related sources
Creatine in health and disease
Broad review source for creatine biology beyond muscle, including phosphocreatine energy buffering and translational health claims.
- Trust score
- 88
- Publisher
- Nutrients
- Access
- Publisher
- Usage
- 3 connections
Personalized nutrition by prediction of glycemic responses
Exact DOI source for individualized postprandial glucose-response research using CGM and predictive modeling.
- Trust score
- 88
- Publisher
- Cell
- Access
- Publisher
- Usage
- 5 connections
