Clinical resourceProfessional clinical guidance
- Source type
- Clinical resource
- Access type
- Publisher
- Publisher
- European Food Safety Authority
- Date
- 2013
- Added
- 2026-07-06
- Updated
- 2026-07-06
Trust profile
VV Source Trust Matrix v1.0
VV Source Trust Matrix v1.0 asks whether this source is trustworthy for the claim lane being used, not whether every possible claim from it is equally strong.
82
Professional clinical guidance
- Publisher type
- Professional guidance
- Bias profile
- Moderate
This source is strongest for safety and consumer context and weaker for mechanism and trial discovery.
VV Source Fit Score 1.0
Fit by use case
Fit scores are role-specific. A source can be excellent for one claim lane and weak for another.
- Regulatory status
- 63/100
- Context Source
- Clinical outcomes
- 78/100
- Strong Support
- Mechanism
- 63/100
- Context Source
- Safety
- 86/100
- Strong Support
- Consumer context
- 82/100
- Strong Support
- Trial discovery
- 63/100
- Context Source
Best used for
- Clinical context
- Practice guidance
Weak for
- Replacing primary evidence
Used in Viral Vitalism
Supporting evidencesignal3 references
Sweeteners: Sugar Escape Hatch or Metabolic Shell Game?
Roles: Supporting evidence
Show section-level references
Related studies
Related sources
GovernmentU.S. health regulator
FDA: aspartame and other sweeteners in food
FDA source for approved sweeteners, acceptable daily intake framing, and the FDA view on aspartame safety.
- Trust score
- 94
- Publisher
- U.S. Food and Drug Administration
- Access
- Official
- Usage
- 3 connections
Clinical resourceProfessional clinical guidance
WHO/IARC/JECFA aspartame hazard and risk assessment release
Primary public source for separating IARC hazard classification from JECFA risk assessment and acceptable daily intake context.
- Trust score
- 82
- Publisher
- World Health Organization
- Access
- Publisher
- Usage
- 5 connections
Topic tags
aspartameregulatory-safetyacceptable-daily-intake