- Source type
- Review
- Access type
- Publisher
- Publisher
- Annual Review of Nutrition
- Date
- 2016
- Added
- 2026-07-07
- Updated
- 2026-07-07
Trust profile
VV Source Trust Matrix v1.0
VV Source Trust Matrix v1.0 asks whether this source is trustworthy for the claim lane being used, not whether every possible claim from it is equally strong.
88
Peer-reviewed research publisher
- Publisher type
- Peer-reviewed journal
- Bias profile
- Moderate
This source is strongest for clinical outcomes and mechanism and weaker for regulatory status and trial discovery.
VV Source Fit Score 1.0
Fit by use case
Fit scores are role-specific. A source can be excellent for one claim lane and weak for another.
- Regulatory status
- 65/100
- Context Source
- Clinical outcomes
- 92/100
- Primary Anchor
- Mechanism
- 90/100
- Primary Anchor
- Safety
- 86/100
- Strong Support
- Consumer context
- 72/100
- Context Source
- Trial discovery
- 65/100
- Context Source
Best used for
- Primary studies
- Systematic reviews
- Mechanistic research
Weak for
- Regulatory status
- Universal consumer recommendations
Used in Viral Vitalism
Ultra-Processed Foods and Protein Everything: Protein Halo or Processing Penalty?
Roles: Supporting evidence
Show section-level references
- Article source list
- Ultra-processed food is not just a moral category
- The controlled-feeding signal is hard to ignore
- Protein leverage is useful, but not a master key
- The protein halo can hide processed-food design
- Older adults need protein, but kidney fear still needs context
- The practical frame: meals first, products second
- VV verdict
- Are ultra-processed foods the main cause of obesity?
- Does protein leverage explain overeating?
- Are protein bars healthy?
- Do high-protein diets damage kidneys?
- What is the simplest rule?
Related studies
Related sources
CDC: Steps for Losing Weight
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention used across the Viral Vitalism evidence library.
- Trust score
- 91
- Publisher
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
- Access
- Official
- Usage
- 7 connections
Daily Value on the Nutrition and Supplement Facts Labels
Use for U.S. Nutrition Facts and Supplement Facts Daily Value context when discussing fiber, saturated fat, sodium, calcium, potassium, iodine, magnesium, and vitamins.
- Trust score
- 94
- Publisher
- U.S. Food and Drug Administration
- Access
- Official
- Usage
- 4 connections
Dietary Guidelines for Americans, 2025–2030
Use for current U.S. dietary-guidance context and contrast with zero-plant eating patterns.
- Trust score
- 91
- Publisher
- U.S. Department of Health and Human Services / U.S. Department of Agriculture
- Access
- Official
- Usage
- 3 connections
NIDDK: Choosing a Safe & Successful Weight-loss Program
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases used across the Viral Vitalism evidence library.
- Trust score
- 91
- Publisher
- National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases
- Access
- Official
- Usage
- 9 connections
NIH Office of Dietary Supplements
Evidence summaries and fact sheets for common supplements.
- Trust score
- 91
- Publisher
- National Institutes of Health
- Access
- Official
- Usage
- 5 connections
Washington Post: Are seed oils bad for you?
Public-debate context, not primary clinical evidence.
- Trust score
- 60
- Publisher
- The Washington Post
- Access
- Publisher
- Usage
- 5 connections