- Source type
- Government
- Access type
- Official
- Publisher
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
- Added
- 2026-07-01
Trust profile
VV Source Trust Matrix v1.0
VV Source Trust Matrix v1.0 asks whether this source is trustworthy for the claim lane being used, not whether every possible claim from it is equally strong.
91
Government health research
- Publisher type
- Government research
- Bias profile
- Low
This source is strongest for safety and clinical outcomes and weaker for consumer context and regulatory status.
VV Source Fit Score 1.0
Fit by use case
Fit scores are role-specific. A source can be excellent for one claim lane and weak for another.
- Regulatory status
- 66/100
- Context Source
- Clinical outcomes
- 90/100
- Primary Anchor
- Mechanism
- 90/100
- Primary Anchor
- Safety
- 92/100
- Primary Anchor
- Consumer context
- 88/100
- Strong Support
- Trial discovery
- 89/100
- Strong Support
Best used for
- Research synthesis
- Public-health context
- Safety resources
Weak for
- Primary endpoint extraction when a study is available
Used in Viral Vitalism
Perineum Tanning Is WellnessTok Sunlight Logic Gone Feral
Roles: Regulatory status
Show section-level references
How to prevent skin cancer
Roles: Regulatory status
Show section-level references
Claim ledger
Claims supported
Reviewed claim cards that cite this source in the evidence graph.
perineum tanning: Perineum tanning is not just harmless eccentric wellness because
Perineum tanning is not just harmless eccentric wellness because it encourages intentional UV exposure to sensitive skin without demonstrated benefit.
perineum tanning: Brief perineum sun exposure has no proven benefit and
Brief perineum sun exposure has no proven benefit and may burn sensitive, usually unexposed skin; risk depends on dose, UV index, skin type, and history.
perineum tanning: An ancient-practice claim does not establish safety or efficacy
An ancient-practice claim does not establish safety or efficacy for perineum sunning under modern dermatology standards.
sun exposure: Sunlight is not always bad; ordinary daylight can support
Sunlight is not always bad; ordinary daylight can support circadian rhythm and vitamin D biology, but UV dose, timing, skin type, and burn avoidance matter.
Related studies
Related sources
FDA Q&A: Proposed order for over-the-counter sunscreen
U.S. Food and Drug Administration used across the Viral Vitalism evidence library.
- Trust score
- 94
- Publisher
- U.S. Food and Drug Administration
- Access
- Official
- Usage
- 9 connections
Risks of tanning
Regulatory/public-health source for tanning risks and tan-as-protection misconceptions.
- Trust score
- 94
- Publisher
- U.S. Food and Drug Administration
- Access
- Official
- Usage
- 6 connections
Solar and ultraviolet radiation carcinogenicity evaluation
Authoritative carcinogenicity context for solar UV and tanning devices.
- Trust score
- 91
- Publisher
- International Agency for Research on Cancer
- Access
- Official
- Usage
- 5 connections
AABB: FDA warns against use of unapproved HCT/Ps
Canonicalized from June 30, 2026 rapid-brief batch.
- Trust score
- 91
- Publisher
- AABB
- Access
- Publisher
- Usage
- 1 connection
CDC: Parasites Diagnosis
Canonical source for this polarized debate signal.
- Trust score
- 91
- Publisher
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
- Access
- Official
- Usage
- 11 connections
FDA: 2026 Safety and Availability Communications
Canonicalized from June 30, 2026 rapid-brief batch.
- Trust score
- 94
- Publisher
- FDA
- Access
- Official
- Usage
- 1 connection
