SCORING MODEL: VV SOURCE FIT SCORE 1.0
A source score that depends on the job.
The VV Source Fit Score explains how well a source fits a specific use case. It is not a universal truth score.
What this framework is for
VV Source Fit Score 1.0 is for showing whether a source fits a specific claim lane: regulatory status, clinical outcomes, mechanism, safety, consumer context, or trial discovery.
What the score does not mean
It is not a universal truth score.
It does not mean a source is equally strong for every claim.
It does not replace reading the source in context.
Score bands
90-100: Primary Anchor
75-89: Strong Support
60-74: Context Source
40-59: Weak Support
Below 40: Discovery Only
Gates and caps
A source can score high in one use case and low in another.
Clinical outcome claims require clinical evidence, not just proximity or authority.
Consumer context sources should not anchor important medical claims by themselves.
Use-Case Lanes
Regulatory status
Clinical outcomes
Mechanism
Safety
Consumer context
Trial discovery
Why Scores Differ
A source might score 96 for regulatory status, 80 for safety context, 55 for clinical outcomes, and 40 for consumer experience. That is normal. Good sourcing depends on matching the source to the claim.
VV Source Fit Score 1.0
Use the Viral Vitalism framework system to make health claims clearer, more contextual, and easier to evaluate.
Viral Vitalism is an educational publication, not medical advice.